# Meta Muse vs Hark Pro for HighLevel

> Choose Meta Muse if you want real HighLevel MCP tools in an always-on agent today. Choose Hark Pro if you want the lowest-cost always-on agent and can live with browser-based access. Meta Muse reaches HighLevel by highlevel mcp; Hark Pro by browser login.

Last verified: October 25, 2026

|  | Meta Muse | Hark Pro |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maker | Meta | Hark |
| Type | Always-on agents | Always-on agents |
| Always on | Yes | Yes |
| Route to HighLevel | MCP | Browser |
| Official GHL MCP tools | Yes (builds its own client) | No |
| Approval controls | Outbound requests pass Meta's Sentinel approval agent | Not documented |
| Scheduling | Crons on its VM | Proactive checks |
| Runs on | Isolated Linux VM with browser | Hark Handoff cloud browsers (up to 36 at once) |
| Business app reach | Built-in connectors + Zapier (9,000+ apps) + custom MCP | Websites via Handoff cloud browsers |
| Access & price | Muse account; custom connectors on its secure VM | Free, $20/month (2x usage), $100/month (10x usage) |
| Setup effort* | Medium | Easy |

## FAQ
### Is Meta Muse or Hark Pro better for HighLevel?
Choose Meta Muse if you want real HighLevel MCP tools in an always-on agent today. Choose Hark Pro if you want the lowest-cost always-on agent and can live with browser-based access. Meta Muse reaches HighLevel by highlevel mcp; Hark Pro by browser login.

### Can Meta Muse use official HighLevel MCP tools?
Meta Muse: Yes (builds its own client). Hark Pro: No.

### Which needs approval before acting, Meta Muse or Hark Pro?
Meta Muse: Outbound requests pass Meta's Sentinel approval agent. Hark Pro: Not documented.

### Can I use Meta Muse and Hark Pro together?
Yes. Give each its own HighLevel staff user or token and assign separate jobs, for example database reactivation with real contact segments to Meta Muse and morning list of stuck opportunities to Hark Pro.